<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patch 3.3 &#8211; T10 vs PVP Set Bonuses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camo</title>
		<link>http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Camo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastrogue.com/?p=859#comment-419</guid>
		<description>There was some elaboration on the former 2p over on EJ:
&quot;The 2/5 T10 gives an expected .13 * 3 = .39 combo points per finisher; this is roughly the same number as 2 points in Ruthlessness.&quot; (http://elitistjerks.com/f78/t64665-incoming_rogue_changes_discussion/p21/#post1416611)
3 CP is of course an incredible burst but might be lackluster: proc on target switch/at 5%. In addition you&#039;ll lose the 200ap and 100 resilience set bonus + the resilience and stam on the pvp gear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was some elaboration on the former 2p over on EJ:<br />
&#8220;The 2/5 T10 gives an expected .13 * 3 = .39 combo points per finisher; this is roughly the same number as 2 points in Ruthlessness.&#8221; (<a href="http://elitistjerks.com/f78/t64665-incoming_rogue_changes_discussion/p21/#post1416611" rel="nofollow">http://elitistjerks.com/f78/t64665-incoming_rogue_changes_discussion/p21/#post1416611</a>)<br />
3 CP is of course an incredible burst but might be lackluster: proc on target switch/at 5%. In addition you&#8217;ll lose the 200ap and 100 resilience set bonus + the resilience and stam on the pvp gear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastrogue.com/?p=859#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Just so long as I can be competitive in PVP without having to PVE im cool with whatever bonus they offer on gear obtained by raiding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so long as I can be competitive in PVP without having to PVE im cool with whatever bonus they offer on gear obtained by raiding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dcruize</title>
		<link>http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Dcruize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastrogue.com/?p=859#comment-409</guid>
		<description>lol yeah it&#039;s november not october...... meh, have changed the numbers around. Thanks for the heads up, serves me right for being gone too long :/ Might be interesting to play with 4 pieces T10, but that&#039;s one hell of a resilience nerf....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol yeah it&#8217;s november not october&#8230;&#8230; meh, have changed the numbers around. Thanks for the heads up, serves me right for being gone too long :/ Might be interesting to play with 4 pieces T10, but that&#8217;s one hell of a resilience nerf&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamatar</title>
		<link>http://lastrogue.com/patch-3-3-t10-vs-pvp-set-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastrogue.com/?p=859#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I may be wrong, but I think they swapped the 2 and 4 piece bonus quite a bit of time ago, and now that nice bonus can be taken only with 4 pieces.. a bit too much probably to be tempting enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be wrong, but I think they swapped the 2 and 4 piece bonus quite a bit of time ago, and now that nice bonus can be taken only with 4 pieces.. a bit too much probably to be tempting enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

